Let's Not Do Responsibility Skepticism

نویسندگان

چکیده

I argue for three conclusions. First, responsibility skeptics are committed to the position that criminal justice system should adopt a universal nonresponsibility excuse. Second, excuse would diminish some of our most deeply held values, further dehumanize criminals, exacerbate mass incarceration, and cause an even greater number innocent people (nonwrongdoers) be punished. Third, while Saul Smilansky's ‘illusionist’ response – if skepticism is correct, society maintain responsibility-realist/retributivist generally compelling, it not work majority were convert, theoretically psychologically, skepticism. In this (highly improbable) scenario, only in need reformed such way aligned with majority's responsibility-skeptical beliefs attitudes.

برای دانلود باید عضویت طلایی داشته باشید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Enough of Processes - Lets do Practices

All modern software development processes try to help project teams conduct their work. While there are some important differences between them, the commonalities are far greater and understandably, since the end goal of them all is to produce working software quickly and effectively. Thus, it doesn’t matter which process you adopt as long as it is adaptable, extensible, and capable of absorbin...

متن کامل

Do Not Copy Do Not Copy Do Not Copy Do Not Copy Do Not Copy Do Not Copy Do Not Copy Do Not Copy Do Not Copy

Design a clocked synchronous state machine with four inputs, G1–G4, that are connected to pushbuttons. The machine has four outputs, L1–L4, connected to lamps or LEDs located near the like-numbered pushbuttons. There is also an ERR output connected to a red lamp. In normal operation, the L1–L4 outputs display a 1-out-of-4 pattern. At each clock tick, the pattern is rotated by one position; the ...

متن کامل

When Responsibility Can't Do It

Is being responsible good enough? Stone (1975) argued that we need corporate moral responsibility because neither law nor market is adequate to forestall harmful effects of business activities. However, it is not possible for businesses to become responsible for all forms of foreseeable, preventable harm that they produce. This is illustrated here by cases from insurance, television programming...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

ژورنال

عنوان ژورنال: Journal of Applied Philosophy

سال: 2022

ISSN: ['1468-5930', '0264-3758']

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/japp.12623